Chinese Taipei
League: Asia Cup U18
Record
3W - 4L
Avg Score
88.1 - 92.9
Points per 100 Possessions
Offensive Rating
101.0
Defensive Rating
106.5
Net Rating
-5.5
| # | Player | Age | Height | Position | Nationality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 |
|
17 | 187 cm (6'2") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 11 |
|
18 | 190 cm (6'3") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 9 |
|
18 | 195 cm (6'5") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 33 |
|
16 | 200 cm (6'7") | C | Chinese Taipei |
| 8 |
|
18 | 186 cm (6'1") | G | Chinese Taipei |
| 17 |
|
17 | 193 cm (6'4") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 12 |
|
18 | 188 cm (6'2") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 14 |
|
17 | 191 cm (6'3") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 5 |
|
18 | 172 cm (5'8") | G | Chinese Taipei |
| 7 |
|
17 | 180 cm (5'11") | G | Chinese Taipei |
| 15 |
|
17 | 188 cm (6'2") | SG | Chinese Taipei |
| 24 |
|
17 | 203 cm (6'8") | PF | Chinese Taipei |
Player Statistics
| Player | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | 2PM | 2PA | 2P% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | TOV | BLK | PF | PFD | EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
7 | 0 | 29:13 | 16 | 6 | 17 | 35.3% | 2 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1.7 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 140:15 | 41 | 17 | 39 | 43.6% | 11 | 23 | 47.8% | 6 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 30 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5.0 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 71:45 | 43 | 13 | 35 | 37.1% | 13 | 32 | 40.6% | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 17 | 25 | 68.0% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 17 | 4.0 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 30:05 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.7 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 234:47 | 114 | 47 | 112 | 42.0% | 40 | 77 | 51.9% | 7 | 35 | 20.0% | 13 | 18 | 72.2% | 15 | 20 | 35 | 27 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 17 | 15.7 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 37:19 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 2 | -0.1 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 99:31 | 34 | 14 | 29 | 48.3% | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 6.9 |
|
|
7 | 1 | 149:25 | 64 | 24 | 57 | 42.1% | 15 | 29 | 51.7% | 9 | 28 | 32.1% | 7 | 13 | 53.8% | 7 | 24 | 31 | 25 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 12.1 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 174:40 | 92 | 34 | 71 | 47.9% | 21 | 41 | 51.2% | 13 | 30 | 43.3% | 11 | 13 | 84.6% | 10 | 20 | 30 | 17 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 16.1 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 110:40 | 29 | 10 | 24 | 41.7% | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 24 | 8 | 14 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 6.3 |
|
|
7 | 6 | 104:40 | 42 | 19 | 47 | 40.4% | 16 | 39 | 41.0% | 3 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 13 | 19 | 32 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 19 | 4 | 8.4 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 217:39 | 132 | 48 | 102 | 47.1% | 38 | 68 | 55.9% | 10 | 34 | 29.4% | 26 | 33 | 78.8% | 16 | 43 | 59 | 12 | 6 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 29 | 19.9 |
| Player | GP | GS | MIN | POSS | USG% | +/- | NETRTG | ORTG | DRTG | TS% | EFG% | AST RATIO | AST% | FT RATE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
7 | 0 | 29:13 | 63 | 3.1 | -16.0 | -94.6 | 24.5 | 119.2 | 15.1% | 15.1% | 1.1 | 0.9% | 0.00 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 140:15 | 137 | 3.5 | -67.0 | -25.5 | 88.5 | 114.0 | 47.0% | 46.6% | 23.9 | 20.0% | 2.04 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 71:45 | 71 | 4.9 | +33.0 | -37.4 | 76.8 | 114.2 | 35.6% | 26.4% | 3.6 | 1.1% | 33.93 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 30:05 | 52 | 2.0 | -15.0 | -105.0 | 10.8 | 115.8 | 7.1% | 7.1% | 1.1 | 0.4% | 0.00 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 234:47 | 245 | 4.5 | -36.0 | 29.4 | 142.4 | 113.0 | 47.5% | 45.1% | 14.3 | 18.2% | 11.50 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 37:19 | 37 | 1.3 | -11.0 | -92.8 | 23.8 | 116.5 | 28.6% | 14.3% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 42.86 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 99:31 | 106 | 2.6 | -7.0 | -19.5 | 94.7 | 114.2 | 44.6% | 43.6% | 5.4 | 4.6% | 2.04 |
|
|
7 | 1 | 149:25 | 149 | 3.7 | +25.0 | 27.2 | 138.3 | 111.1 | 58.6% | 56.0% | 21.2 | 16.8% | 10.34 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 174:40 | 185 | 3.6 | -31.0 | 46.1 | 158.1 | 112.0 | 55.9% | 51.4% | 13.3 | 10.1% | 16.27 |
|
|
7 | 0 | 110:40 | 92 | 2.6 | 0 | -16.4 | 96.8 | 113.1 | 42.7% | 41.6% | 23.7 | 13.8% | 10.71 |
|
|
7 | 6 | 104:40 | 121 | 4.0 | -32.0 | -14.7 | 97.0 | 111.7 | 49.2% | 49.0% | 8.9 | 6.6% | 1.10 |
|
|
7 | 7 | 217:39 | 236 | 4.7 | -8.0 | 56.5 | 168.9 | 112.4 | 57.7% | 52.6% | 5.4 | 7.5% | 25.45 |
Stats based on team's performance on basketball games.
Glossary and
stats explanations.
Chinese Taipei Shot Chart
Note: Shot chart colors show how a team or player performs relative to league averages in each court sector, using sector-specific league rankings rather than fixed shooting percentages.
Elite
Average
Cold
No Data
Sector Breakdown
Attempts Share
Points Distribution
Scoring Breakdown
Note: Percentages calculated using average per game values. Hover over each section to see
values.
Chinese Taipei Stats
PTS
88.1
4th
ORTG
101.0
7th
eFG%
48.9
6th
AST
22.7
3rd
OREB
14.1
8th
OREB%
31.2
9th
DREB
27.0
11th
DREB%
55.5
15th
TOV
16.3
9th
TOV%
18.8
7th
Opponent Stats
PTS
92.9
3rd
ORTG
106.5
5th
eFG%
48.3
7th
AST
19.0
7th
OREB
21.7
2nd
OREB%
44.5
2nd
DREB
31.9
3rd
DREB%
68.8
5th
TOV
18.1
6th
TOV%
20.4
8th
Note: Color-scale:
worst,
bad,
average,
good,
perfect.
The color-scale used for the opponents is reversed (the best the opponents perform, the worst is for
the team).
Team Efficiency
Points scored - points allowed per 100 possessions.
Full Season
101.0 - 106.5
-5.5
Record: 3W - 4L
A · GROUP PHASE · SINGLE FINAL
97.7 - 99.6
-1.9
Record: 1W - 2L
26 · QUALIFICATION TO QUARTER-FINALS · SINGLE FINA
114.7 - 102.1
12.7
Record: 1W - 0L
32 · QUARTER-FINALS · SINGLE FINAL
102.6 - 140.8
-38.2
Record: 0W - 1L
33 · CLASS. 5-8 · SINGLE FINAL
96.6 - 115.4
-18.8
Record: 0W - 1L
37 · CLASS. 7-8 · SINGLE FINAL
100.0 - 88.6
11.4
Record: 1W - 0L
Home Games
101.2 - 96.1
5.1
Record: 1W - 1L
Road Games
101.0 - 110.7
-9.8
Record: 2W - 3L
Note: Team efficiency is one of the most important metrics in basketball. It shows how many points a
team scores/allows per possession (here per 100 possessions). This can be a better indicator than
the average scoring per game, as it is not affected by the pace of the game or by extra minutes
played (overtime).
